Construct: Job Autonomy
Source 1: Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1980). Work redesign. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley. Four items to determine participants work authority.
Used in Ng, Kok-Yee; Ang, Soon; Chan, Kim-Yin. 2008. Personality and Leader Effectiveness. A Moderated Mediation Model of Leadership Self Efficacy, Job Demands and Job Autonomy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(4):733-743; Cronbach’s alpha reliability=.90.
Source2: Spector, P. E., & Fox, S. (2003). Reducing subjectivity in the assessment of the job environment: Development of the factual autonomy scale, FAS. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 417-432.
Construct: Gender Attitudes
Source: Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512. 11 items to determine a measure of “Hostile and Benevolent Sexism”
Used as a control in Umphress, Elizabeth E.; Simmons, Aneika L.; Boswell, Wendy R.; Triana, María del Carmen. 2008. Managing Discrimination in Selection: The Influence of Directives from an Authority and Social Dominance Orientation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(5):982-993.
Control for hostile sexism: Cronbach’s alpha=.89
Control for benevolent sexism: Cronbach’s alpha=.82
Construct: Value Congruence
Source: Edwards, J. R., & Cable, D. M. (2009). The value of value congruence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 654-677.
39 items. 6 categories
Construct: Team Effectiveness
Source: Park, Guihyun, & DeShon, Richard P. (2010). A Multilevel Model of Minority Opinion Expression and Team Decision-Making Effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(5), 824-833.
Construct: Intrateam Trust
Source:McAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy Of Management Journal, 38(1), 24-59.
Explores affect- and cognition- based trust in teams.
Construct: Team Psychological Safety
Source:Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350-383.
Presents idea of Team Psychological Safety.
Construct: Innovativeness (outcome measures)
Source 1: West, M. A. & Anderson, N. R. 1996. Innovation in Top Management Teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(6): 680-693. 8 dimensions of Innovation. Cronbach’s alpha = .92
Source 2: George, J. M. & Zhou, J. 2001. When openness to experience and conscientiousness are related to creative behavior: An interactional approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3): 513-524. 13 items
Construct: Climate for Innovation
Source 1: Patterson, M. G., West, M. A., Shackleton, V. J., Dawson, J. F., Lawthom, R., Maitlis, S., Robinson, D. L., & Wallace, A. M. 2005. Validating the organizational climate measure: links to managerial practices, productivity and innovation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4): 379-408. 95 items 17 Dimensions.
Source 2: Anderson, N. R. & West, M. A. 1998. Measuring climate for work group innovation: development and validation of the team climate inventory. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19(3): 235-258. 61 items. 5 dimensions
Construct: Divergent Thinking
Source: Silvia, P. J., Winterstein, B. P., Willse, J. T., Barona, C. M., Cram, J. T., Hess, K. I., Martinez, J. L., & Richard, C. A. In press, 2007. Assessing Creativity with Divergent Thinking Tasks: Exploring the Reliability and Validity of New Subjective Scoring Methods. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, In Press. Subjects were asked to come up with creative ideas that were then scored by the researchers.